Eritrea vs Kiribati: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Eritrea
- Kiribati
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0.0012 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0012 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 176th and Kiribati ranks 177th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0037 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | 0.0037 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0.0038 kg/ha | 0.0366 kg/ha | 0.0328 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 0.0032 kg/ha | 0.1221 kg/ha | 0.1188 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 0.0009 kg/ha | 0.0122 kg/ha | 0.0113 kg/ha | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Eritrea or Kiribati?
- Eritrea, at 0.0012 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Eritrea and Kiribati?
- 0.0012 kg/ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Kiribati?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Kiribati rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Eritrea ranks 176th and Kiribati ranks 177th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).