Eritrea vs South Sudan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Eritrea
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.0013 kg/ha against 0.0012 kg/ha in Eritrea, a difference of 0.0001 kg/ha.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 176th and South Sudan ranks 175th of 186 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0025 kg/ha | 0.0062 kg/ha | 0.0037 kg/ha | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.0009 kg/ha | 0.0033 kg/ha | 0.0024 kg/ha | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Eritrea or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.0013 kg/ha against 0.0012 kg/ha in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Eritrea and South Sudan?
- 0.0001 kg/ha, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and South Sudan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Eritrea ranks 176th and South Sudan ranks 175th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).