Ethiopia PDR vs Kiribati: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Kiribati
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 0.0076 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0076 kg/ha.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 174th and Kiribati ranks 177th of 186 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0121 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | 0.0121 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 0.0099 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | 0.0099 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Ethiopia PDR or Kiribati?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 0.0076 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Kiribati as of 1983.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Ethiopia PDR and Kiribati?
- 0.0076 kg/ha, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Kiribati?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 1983.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Kiribati rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 174th and Kiribati ranks 177th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).