Ethiopia vs Guinea: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Ethiopia
- Guinea
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 0.0866 kg/ha against 0.0294 kg/ha in Guinea, a difference of 0.0572 kg/ha.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 2.9 times Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Guinea ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 170th and Guinea ranks 172nd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Guinea in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0255 kg/ha | 0.1667 kg/ha | 0.1413 kg/ha | Guinea |
| 2000s | 0.1862 kg/ha | 0.0987 kg/ha | 0.0876 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 0.0817 kg/ha | 0.4029 kg/ha | 0.3212 kg/ha | Guinea |
| 2020s | 0.0736 kg/ha | 0.5692 kg/ha | 0.4956 kg/ha | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Ethiopia or Guinea?
- Ethiopia, at 0.0866 kg/ha against 0.0294 kg/ha in Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Ethiopia and Guinea?
- 0.0572 kg/ha, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Guinea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Guinea rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Ethiopia ranks 170th and Guinea ranks 172nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).