Fiji vs Malta: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Fiji
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 15.22 kg/ha against 14.6 kg/ha in Fiji, a difference of 0.62 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.
Fiji ranks 62nd and Malta ranks 59th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 3 and Malta in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.12 kg/ha | 1.9 kg/ha | 0.7779 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1970s | 5 kg/ha | 4.03 kg/ha | 0.9738 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 1980s | 12.83 kg/ha | 8.15 kg/ha | 4.69 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 1990s | 17.81 kg/ha | 8.41 kg/ha | 9.4 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 2000s | 2.82 kg/ha | 13.73 kg/ha | 10.91 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2010s | 6.91 kg/ha | 10.62 kg/ha | 3.71 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2020s | 9.98 kg/ha | 13.9 kg/ha | 3.92 kg/ha | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Fiji or Malta?
- Malta, at 15.22 kg/ha against 14.6 kg/ha in Fiji as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Fiji and Malta?
- 0.62 kg/ha, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Malta?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and Malta rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Fiji ranks 62nd and Malta ranks 59th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).