Georgia vs Luxembourg: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Georgia
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 6.9 kg/ha against 6.76 kg/ha in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.14 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Georgia ranks 100th and Luxembourg ranks 101st of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.7284 kg/ha | 14.09 kg/ha | 13.36 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 3.6 kg/ha | 7.86 kg/ha | 4.27 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 6.93 kg/ha | 5.5 kg/ha | 1.43 kg/ha | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Georgia or Luxembourg?
- Georgia, at 6.9 kg/ha against 6.76 kg/ha in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Georgia and Luxembourg?
- 0.14 kg/ha, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Luxembourg rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Georgia ranks 100th and Luxembourg ranks 101st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).