Guinea vs Kazakhstan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Guinea
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.0849 kg/ha against 0.0294 kg/ha in Guinea, a difference of 0.0555 kg/ha.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 2.9 times Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Guinea ranks 172nd and Kazakhstan ranks 171st of 186 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1502 kg/ha | 0.1311 kg/ha | 0.0192 kg/ha | Guinea |
| 2000s | 0.0987 kg/ha | 0.0526 kg/ha | 0.0461 kg/ha | Guinea |
| 2010s | 0.4029 kg/ha | 0.084 kg/ha | 0.3188 kg/ha | Guinea |
| 2020s | 0.5692 kg/ha | 0.086 kg/ha | 0.4832 kg/ha | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Guinea or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.0849 kg/ha against 0.0294 kg/ha in Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Guinea and Kazakhstan?
- 0.0555 kg/ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Guinea and Kazakhstan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Guinea ranks 172nd and Kazakhstan ranks 171st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).