Guyana vs Lithuania: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Guyana
- Lithuania
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 16.54 kg/ha against 15.25 kg/ha in Lithuania, a difference of 1.29 kg/ha.
That makes Guyana's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Guyana ranks 56th and Lithuania ranks 58th of 185 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.52 kg/ha | 8.38 kg/ha | 0.863 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 4.82 kg/ha | 15.11 kg/ha | 10.29 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 11.19 kg/ha | 17.02 kg/ha | 5.83 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 15.47 kg/ha | 17.14 kg/ha | 1.67 kg/ha | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Guyana or Lithuania?
- Guyana, at 16.54 kg/ha against 15.25 kg/ha in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Guyana and Lithuania?
- 1.29 kg/ha, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Guyana and Lithuania rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Guyana ranks 56th and Lithuania ranks 58th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).