Japan vs Montenegro: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Japan
- Montenegro
How they compare
Japan currently reports 29.32 kg/ha against 27.96 kg/ha in Montenegro, a difference of 1.36 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 30th and Montenegro ranks 33rd of 186 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.03 kg/ha | 35.63 kg/ha | 18.4 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2010s | 46.89 kg/ha | 30.96 kg/ha | 15.94 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2020s | 34.91 kg/ha | 32.32 kg/ha | 2.59 kg/ha | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Japan or Montenegro?
- Japan, at 29.32 kg/ha against 27.96 kg/ha in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Japan and Montenegro?
- 1.36 kg/ha, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Montenegro rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Japan ranks 30th and Montenegro ranks 33rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).