Kyrgyzstan vs Uganda: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Uganda
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0.6303 kg/ha against 0.5783 kg/ha in Uganda, a difference of 0.052 kg/ha.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 160th and Uganda ranks 161st of 186 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.22 kg/ha | 0.0566 kg/ha | 2.17 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 0.1788 kg/ha | 0.1699 kg/ha | 0.0089 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 0.2908 kg/ha | 0.2859 kg/ha | 0.005 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 1.15 kg/ha | 0.4561 kg/ha | 0.6906 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Kyrgyzstan or Uganda?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 0.6303 kg/ha against 0.5783 kg/ha in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Kyrgyzstan and Uganda?
- 0.052 kg/ha, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Uganda?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Uganda rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 160th and Uganda ranks 161st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).