Lesotho vs Tajikistan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Lesotho
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 1.02 kg/ha against 0.9985 kg/ha in Lesotho, a difference of 0.0215 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Lesotho ranks 153rd and Tajikistan ranks 151st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 3 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.23 kg/ha | 3.43 kg/ha | 0.7976 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 1.93 kg/ha | 0.9726 kg/ha | 0.9538 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 0.726 kg/ha | 0.5064 kg/ha | 0.2197 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 0.7838 kg/ha | 1.74 kg/ha | 0.9575 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Lesotho or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 1.02 kg/ha against 0.9985 kg/ha in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Lesotho and Tajikistan?
- 0.0215 kg/ha, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lesotho and Tajikistan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Lesotho ranks 153rd and Tajikistan ranks 151st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).