Mali vs Nepal: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Mali
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 1.67 kg/ha against 1.59 kg/ha in Mali, a difference of 0.08 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 142nd and Nepal ranks 141st of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 6 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0402 kg/ha | 0.0354 kg/ha | 0.0047 kg/ha | Mali |
| 1970s | 0.4987 kg/ha | 0.4099 kg/ha | 0.0887 kg/ha | Mali |
| 1980s | 1.49 kg/ha | 0.3256 kg/ha | 1.16 kg/ha | Mali |
| 1990s | 1.52 kg/ha | 0.6214 kg/ha | 0.8954 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2000s | 2.96 kg/ha | 0.5382 kg/ha | 2.42 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2010s | 2.68 kg/ha | 1.12 kg/ha | 1.56 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2020s | 2.45 kg/ha | 3.17 kg/ha | 0.7203 kg/ha | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Mali or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 1.67 kg/ha against 1.59 kg/ha in Mali as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Mali and Nepal?
- 0.08 kg/ha, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Nepal?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mali and Nepal rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Mali ranks 142nd and Nepal ranks 141st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).