Poland vs Uzbekistan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Poland
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Poland currently reports 24.99 kg/ha against 23.83 kg/ha in Uzbekistan, a difference of 1.16 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Poland ranks 36th and Uzbekistan ranks 38th of 186 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.82 kg/ha | 9.12 kg/ha | 8.69 kg/ha | Poland |
| 2000s | 24.87 kg/ha | 3.68 kg/ha | 21.19 kg/ha | Poland |
| 2010s | 33.21 kg/ha | 9.19 kg/ha | 24.02 kg/ha | Poland |
| 2020s | 30.57 kg/ha | 16.15 kg/ha | 14.43 kg/ha | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Poland or Uzbekistan?
- Poland, at 24.99 kg/ha against 23.83 kg/ha in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Poland and Uzbekistan?
- 1.16 kg/ha, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Poland and Uzbekistan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Poland ranks 36th and Uzbekistan ranks 38th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).