Slovakia vs Saint Lucia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Slovakia
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 9.42 kg/ha against 9.28 kg/ha in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.14 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovakia ahead.
Slovakia ranks 87th and Saint Lucia ranks 88th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Slovakia averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovakia | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.33 kg/ha | 11.96 kg/ha | 3.63 kg/ha | Saint Lucia |
| 2000s | 9.27 kg/ha | 13.23 kg/ha | 3.96 kg/ha | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 10.07 kg/ha | 10.88 kg/ha | 0.8145 kg/ha | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 11.59 kg/ha | 9.24 kg/ha | 2.36 kg/ha | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Slovakia or Saint Lucia?
- Slovakia, at 9.42 kg/ha against 9.28 kg/ha in Saint Lucia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Slovakia and Saint Lucia?
- 0.14 kg/ha, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovakia and Saint Lucia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Slovakia and Saint Lucia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Slovakia ranks 87th and Saint Lucia ranks 88th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).