Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area

Syrian Arab Republic
0.414 kg/ha
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
1.14 kg/ha
in 2023
Syrian Arab Republic rank
17th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
14th

Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Syrian Arab Republic
  • United Republic of Tanzania
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 1.14 kg/ha against 0.414 kg/ha in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.726 kg/ha.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 2.7 times Syrian Arab Republic's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Syrian Arab Republic ranks 17th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 14th of 18 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Syrian Arab Republic averaged higher in 3 and United Republic of Tanzania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Syrian Arab Republic United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0872 kg/ha 0.2252 kg/ha 0.138 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 0.2402 kg/ha 0.4143 kg/ha 0.174 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 0.9289 kg/ha 0.282 kg/ha 0.6469 kg/ha Syrian Arab Republic
1990s 1.03 kg/ha 0.3528 kg/ha 0.68 kg/ha Syrian Arab Republic
2000s 1.25 kg/ha 0.1877 kg/ha 1.07 kg/ha Syrian Arab Republic
2010s 0.4845 kg/ha 0.652 kg/ha 0.1675 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 0.38 kg/ha 1.08 kg/ha 0.6979 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Syrian Arab Republic or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 1.14 kg/ha against 0.414 kg/ha in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania?
0.726 kg/ha, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
Syrian Arab Republic ranks 17th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 14th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-fertilizers-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/syrian-arab-republic-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-fertilizers-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/syrian-arab-republic-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,440 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).