Afghanistan vs Comoros: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Afghanistan
- Comoros
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 83 t against 66.4 t in Comoros, a difference of 16.6 t.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.2 times Comoros's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Comoros ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 159th and Comoros ranks 162nd of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 3 and Comoros in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 83 t | 83 t | 0 t | — |
| 1970s | 71.13 t | 83 t | 11.87 t | Comoros |
| 1980s | 85.8 t | 83 t | 2.8 t | Afghanistan |
| 1990s | 31.24 t | 83 t | 51.76 t | Comoros |
| 2000s | 13.43 t | 22.08 t | 8.64 t | Comoros |
| 2010s | 68.77 t | 11.12 t | 57.64 t | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 190.17 t | 74.91 t | 115.27 t | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Afghanistan or Comoros?
- Afghanistan, at 83 t against 66.4 t in Comoros as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Afghanistan and Comoros?
- 16.6 t, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Comoros?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Afghanistan and Comoros rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Afghanistan ranks 159th and Comoros ranks 162nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).