Afghanistan vs Ethiopia PDR: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Afghanistan
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 100 t against 83 t in Afghanistan, a difference of 17 t.
That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.2 times Afghanistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Ethiopia PDR ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 159th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 157th of 186 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Ethiopia PDR in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 60.73 t | 166.67 t | 105.94 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 134.5 t | 133.33 t | 1.17 t | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Afghanistan or Ethiopia PDR?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 100 t against 83 t in Afghanistan as of 1983.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Afghanistan and Ethiopia PDR?
- 17 t, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Ethiopia PDR?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 1983.
- How do Afghanistan and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Afghanistan ranks 159th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 157th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).