Angola vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Angola
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Angola currently reports 7,031 t against 6,286 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 745 t.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Angola ranks 94th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 97th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Bosnia and Herzegovina in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,842 t | 4,669 t | 2,827 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | 3,523 t | 6,188 t | 2,666 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 10,041 t | 7,429 t | 2,611 t | Angola |
| 2020s | 10,034 t | 6,572 t | 3,462 t | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Angola or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Angola, at 7,031 t against 6,286 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Angola and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 745 t, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Angola ranks 94th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 97th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).