Argentina vs Burkina Faso: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Argentina
- Burkina Faso
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 32,819 t against 32,440 t in Burkina Faso, a difference of 379 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 55th and Burkina Faso ranks 57th of 186 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Burkina Faso | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,992 t | 24.07 t | 3,968 t | Argentina |
| 1970s | 5,996 t | 622.09 t | 5,374 t | Argentina |
| 1980s | 7,335 t | 2,614 t | 4,722 t | Argentina |
| 1990s | 20,144 t | 5,530 t | 14,614 t | Argentina |
| 2000s | 31,653 t | 8,872 t | 22,781 t | Argentina |
| 2010s | 35,421 t | 17,414 t | 18,007 t | Argentina |
| 2020s | 45,279 t | 21,883 t | 23,397 t | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Argentina or Burkina Faso?
- Argentina, at 32,819 t against 32,440 t in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Argentina and Burkina Faso?
- 379 t, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Burkina Faso?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Burkina Faso rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Argentina ranks 55th and Burkina Faso ranks 57th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).