Argentina vs Czechoslovakia: Mineral fertilizers β Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers β Cropland potassium over time
- Argentina
- Czechoslovakia
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 35,100 t against 32,819 t in Argentina, a difference of 2,281 t.
That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 55th and Czechoslovakia ranks 52nd of 185 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Czechoslovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,992 t | 357,573 t | 353,581 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 5,996 t | 606,813 t | 600,817 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 7,335 t | 536,643 t | 529,308 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 13,197 t | 150,867 t | 137,670 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers β cropland potassium, Argentina or Czechoslovakia?
- Czechoslovakia, at 35,100 t against 32,819 t in Argentina as of 1992.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers β cropland potassium between Argentina and Czechoslovakia?
- 2,281 t, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Czechoslovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Argentina and Czechoslovakia rank globally for mineral fertilizers β cropland potassium?
- Argentina ranks 55th and Czechoslovakia ranks 52nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).