Argentina vs Serbia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Argentina
- Serbia
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 32,819 t against 32,366 t in Serbia, a difference of 453 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Argentina ranks 55th and Serbia ranks 58th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35,037 t | 35,906 t | 868.57 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 35,421 t | 37,806 t | 2,385 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 45,279 t | 38,516 t | 6,764 t | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Argentina or Serbia?
- Argentina, at 32,819 t against 32,366 t in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Argentina and Serbia?
- 453 t, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Serbia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Argentina ranks 55th and Serbia ranks 58th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).