Armenia vs Ethiopia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Armenia
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 1,599 t against 1,325 t in Armenia, a difference of 274 t.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.2 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 133rd and Ethiopia ranks 131st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Ethiopia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,490 t | 267.32 t | 2,223 t | Armenia |
| 2000s | 133.22 t | 2,615 t | 2,482 t | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 437.99 t | 1,413 t | 974.69 t | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 1,180 t | 1,367 t | 187.27 t | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Armenia or Ethiopia?
- Ethiopia, at 1,599 t against 1,325 t in Armenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Armenia and Ethiopia?
- 274 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Ethiopia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Armenia ranks 133rd and Ethiopia ranks 131st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).