Australia vs Yugoslav SFR: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Australia
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Australia currently reports 183,384 t against 154,300 t in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 29,084 t.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times Yugoslav SFR's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 19th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 23rd of 186 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 41,756 t | 126,105 t | 84,349 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 66,884 t | 176,856 t | 109,972 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 93,649 t | 241,901 t | 148,252 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 95,441 t | 172,150 t | 76,709 t | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Australia or Yugoslav SFR?
- Australia, at 183,384 t against 154,300 t in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Australia and Yugoslav SFR?
- 29,084 t, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Australia and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Australia ranks 19th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 23rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).