Azerbaijan vs Estonia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Azerbaijan
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 8,975 t against 8,576 t in Azerbaijan, a difference of 399 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Azerbaijan ranks 89th and Estonia ranks 88th of 186 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,646 t | 10,283 t | 7,637 t | Estonia |
| 2000s | 1,851 t | 7,210 t | 5,359 t | Estonia |
| 2010s | 4,082 t | 11,391 t | 7,309 t | Estonia |
| 2020s | 8,842 t | 11,767 t | 2,925 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Azerbaijan or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 8,975 t against 8,576 t in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Azerbaijan and Estonia?
- 399 t, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Estonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Estonia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Azerbaijan ranks 89th and Estonia ranks 88th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).