Bangladesh vs Belarus: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Bangladesh
- Belarus
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 466,712 t against 326,720 t in Belarus, a difference of 139,992 t.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.4 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 11th and Belarus ranks 12th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Belarus in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 85,607 t | 300,211 t | 214,604 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 124,396 t | 335,088 t | 210,692 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 317,434 t | 366,892 t | 49,458 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 421,246 t | 321,454 t | 99,792 t | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Bangladesh or Belarus?
- Bangladesh, at 466,712 t against 326,720 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Bangladesh and Belarus?
- 139,992 t, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Belarus?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Belarus rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Bangladesh ranks 11th and Belarus ranks 12th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).