Barbados vs Grenada: Mineral fertilizers β Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers β Cropland potassium over time
- Barbados
- Grenada
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 29.05 t against 27.39 t in Grenada, a difference of 1.66 t.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Grenada's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 179th and Grenada ranks 180th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 6 and Grenada in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,476 t | 108.73 t | 2,367 t | Barbados |
| 1970s | 2,128 t | 108.73 t | 2,019 t | Barbados |
| 1980s | 1,524 t | 108.73 t | 1,415 t | Barbados |
| 1990s | 830 t | 108.73 t | 721.27 t | Barbados |
| 2000s | 197.62 t | 64.24 t | 133.38 t | Barbados |
| 2010s | 124.83 t | 73.54 t | 51.29 t | Barbados |
| 2020s | 29.46 t | 37.56 t | 8.09 t | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers β cropland potassium, Barbados or Grenada?
- Barbados, at 29.05 t against 27.39 t in Grenada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers β cropland potassium between Barbados and Grenada?
- 1.66 t, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Grenada?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and Grenada rank globally for mineral fertilizers β cropland potassium?
- Barbados ranks 179th and Grenada ranks 180th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).