Barbados vs Maldives: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Barbados
- Maldives
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 49.8 t against 29.05 t in Barbados, a difference of 20.75 t.
That makes Maldives's figure about 1.7 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 165th and Maldives ranks 164th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 6 and Maldives in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,476 t | 3.32 t | 2,473 t | Barbados |
| 1970s | 2,128 t | 3.32 t | 2,124 t | Barbados |
| 1980s | 1,524 t | 3.32 t | 1,520 t | Barbados |
| 1990s | 830 t | 3.32 t | 826.68 t | Barbados |
| 2000s | 197.62 t | 44.82 t | 152.8 t | Barbados |
| 2010s | 124.83 t | 51.13 t | 73.7 t | Barbados |
| 2020s | 29.46 t | 47.31 t | 17.85 t | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Barbados or Maldives?
- Maldives, at 49.8 t against 29.05 t in Barbados as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Barbados and Maldives?
- 20.75 t, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Maldives?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and Maldives rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Barbados ranks 165th and Maldives ranks 164th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).