Belarus vs Central America: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Belarus
- Central America
How they compare
Central America currently reports 360,020 t against 326,720 t in Belarus, a difference of 33,300 t.
That makes Central America's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 12th and Central America ranks 18th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Central America in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Central America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 300,211 t | 181,564 t | 118,647 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 335,088 t | 257,367 t | 77,721 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 366,892 t | 384,505 t | 17,613 t | Central America |
| 2020s | 321,454 t | 430,967 t | 109,513 t | Central America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Belarus or Central America?
- Central America, at 360,020 t against 326,720 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Belarus and Central America?
- 33,300 t, with Central America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Central America?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Central America rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Belarus ranks 12th and Central America ranks 18th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).