Belarus vs Southern Asia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Belarus
- Southern Asia
How they compare
Southern Asia currently reports 2.00 million t against 326,720 t in Belarus, a difference of 1.67 million t.
That makes Southern Asia's figure about 6.1 times Belarus's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Southern Asia has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 12th and Southern Asia ranks 9th of 186 countries.
Southern Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Southern Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 300,211 t | 1.07 million t | 771,397 t | Southern Asia |
| 2000s | 335,088 t | 2.00 million t | 1.67 million t | Southern Asia |
| 2010s | 366,892 t | 2.38 million t | 2.02 million t | Southern Asia |
| 2020s | 321,454 t | 2.31 million t | 1.99 million t | Southern Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Belarus or Southern Asia?
- Southern Asia, at 2.00 million t against 326,720 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Belarus and Southern Asia?
- 1.67 million t, with Southern Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Southern Asia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Southern Asia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Belarus ranks 12th and Southern Asia ranks 9th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).