Belarus vs Spain: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Belarus
- Spain
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 326,720 t against 248,934 t in Spain, a difference of 77,786 t.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.3 times Spain's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 13th and Spain ranks 16th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Spain in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 300,211 t | 367,275 t | 67,064 t | Spain |
| 2000s | 335,088 t | 341,454 t | 6,366 t | Spain |
| 2010s | 366,892 t | 303,993 t | 62,899 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 321,454 t | 288,760 t | 32,694 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Belarus or Spain?
- Belarus, at 326,720 t against 248,934 t in Spain as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Belarus and Spain?
- 77,786 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Spain?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Spain rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Belarus ranks 13th and Spain ranks 16th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).