Belgium vs Saudi Arabia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Belgium
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 49,649 t against 41,210 t in Belgium, a difference of 8,439 t.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.2 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 44th and Saudi Arabia ranks 41st of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Saudi Arabia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64,708 t | 13,562 t | 51,146 t | Belgium |
| 2010s | 50,170 t | 20,385 t | 29,785 t | Belgium |
| 2020s | 43,430 t | 54,112 t | 10,682 t | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Belgium or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 49,649 t against 41,210 t in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Belgium and Saudi Arabia?
- 8,439 t, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Saudi Arabia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Saudi Arabia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Belgium ranks 44th and Saudi Arabia ranks 41st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).