Belize vs Sudan (former): Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Belize
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Belize currently reports 4,795 t against 3,750 t in Sudan (former), a difference of 1,045 t.
That makes Belize's figure about 1.3 times Sudan (former)'s.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Sudan (former) ahead.
Belize ranks 104th and Sudan (former) ranks 105th of 185 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 3 and Sudan (former) in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 63.08 t | 63 t | 0.08 t | Belize |
| 1980s | 391.76 t | 333.33 t | 58.43 t | Belize |
| 1990s | 830 t | 600 t | 230 t | Belize |
| 2000s | 712.05 t | 2,650 t | 1,938 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 506.3 t | 4,350 t | 3,844 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Belize or Sudan (former)?
- Belize, at 4,795 t against 3,750 t in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Belize and Sudan (former)?
- 1,045 t, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Sudan (former)?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2011.
- How do Belize and Sudan (former) rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Belize ranks 104th and Sudan (former) ranks 105th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).