Belize vs Uganda: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Belize
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 5,262 t against 4,795 t in Belize, a difference of 467 t.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Belize's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.
Belize ranks 114th and Uganda ranks 112th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 4 and Uganda in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 126.25 t | 653.86 t | 527.6 t | Uganda |
| 1970s | 216.88 t | 549.18 t | 332.3 t | Uganda |
| 1980s | 707.58 t | 80.05 t | 627.53 t | Belize |
| 1990s | 1,195 t | 371.67 t | 823.53 t | Belize |
| 2000s | 675.12 t | 1,388 t | 713.3 t | Uganda |
| 2010s | 3,755 t | 2,597 t | 1,158 t | Belize |
| 2020s | 5,127 t | 4,150 t | 977.22 t | Belize |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Belize or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 5,262 t against 4,795 t in Belize as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Belize and Uganda?
- 467 t, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Uganda rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Belize ranks 114th and Uganda ranks 112th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).