Bhutan vs Ethiopia PDR: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Bhutan
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 131.97 t against 100 t in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 31.97 t.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.3 times Ethiopia PDR's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 155th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 157th of 186 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 53.12 t | 166.67 t | 113.55 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 53.12 t | 133.33 t | 80.21 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Bhutan or Ethiopia PDR?
- Bhutan, at 131.97 t against 100 t in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Bhutan and Ethiopia PDR?
- 31.97 t, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Ethiopia PDR?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 1983.
- How do Bhutan and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Bhutan ranks 155th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 157th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).