Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kuwait: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Kuwait
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 6,410 t against 6,286 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 124 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 97th and Kuwait ranks 96th of 186 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Kuwait | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,669 t | 25.69 t | 4,643 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | 6,188 t | 511.76 t | 5,677 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 7,429 t | 4,270 t | 3,159 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 6,572 t | 5,721 t | 850.23 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Kuwait?
- Kuwait, at 6,410 t against 6,286 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kuwait?
- 124 t, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kuwait?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kuwait rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 97th and Kuwait ranks 96th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).