Botswana vs Georgia: Mineral fertilizers β Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers β Cropland potassium over time
- Botswana
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 2,978 t against 2,692 t in Botswana, a difference of 286 t.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Botswana ranks 126th and Georgia ranks 123rd of 201 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 113.4 t | 1,660 t | 1,547 t | Georgia |
| 2000s | 401.3 t | 661.26 t | 259.96 t | Georgia |
| 2010s | 773.06 t | 1,668 t | 894.82 t | Georgia |
| 2020s | 1,466 t | 3,037 t | 1,571 t | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers β cropland potassium, Botswana or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 2,978 t against 2,692 t in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers β cropland potassium between Botswana and Georgia?
- 286 t, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Georgia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Georgia rank globally for mineral fertilizers β cropland potassium?
- Botswana ranks 126th and Georgia ranks 123rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).