Bulgaria vs Senegal: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Bulgaria
- Senegal
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 18,758 t against 15,748 t in Senegal, a difference of 3,010 t.
That makes Bulgaria's figure about 1.2 times Senegal's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bulgaria ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 75th and Senegal ranks 78th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 6 and Senegal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 14,246 t | 2,946 t | 11,300 t | Bulgaria |
| 1970s | 37,184 t | 8,401 t | 28,782 t | Bulgaria |
| 1980s | 87,866 t | 5,239 t | 82,627 t | Bulgaria |
| 1990s | 19,746 t | 3,403 t | 16,343 t | Bulgaria |
| 2000s | 3,840 t | 4,830 t | 989.9 t | Senegal |
| 2010s | 21,976 t | 9,134 t | 12,842 t | Bulgaria |
| 2020s | 21,487 t | 14,005 t | 7,482 t | Bulgaria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Bulgaria or Senegal?
- Bulgaria, at 18,758 t against 15,748 t in Senegal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Bulgaria and Senegal?
- 3,010 t, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Senegal?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bulgaria and Senegal rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Bulgaria ranks 75th and Senegal ranks 78th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).