Burkina Faso vs Cameroon: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Burkina Faso
- Cameroon
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 32,609 t against 32,440 t in Burkina Faso, a difference of 169 t.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cameroon ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 57th and Cameroon ranks 56th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Cameroon in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Cameroon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 24.07 t | 2,995 t | 2,970 t | Cameroon |
| 1970s | 622.09 t | 5,450 t | 4,827 t | Cameroon |
| 1980s | 2,614 t | 8,416 t | 5,802 t | Cameroon |
| 1990s | 5,530 t | 8,841 t | 3,311 t | Cameroon |
| 2000s | 8,872 t | 12,946 t | 4,074 t | Cameroon |
| 2010s | 17,414 t | 16,490 t | 924.64 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 21,883 t | 25,895 t | 4,012 t | Cameroon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Burkina Faso or Cameroon?
- Cameroon, at 32,609 t against 32,440 t in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Burkina Faso and Cameroon?
- 169 t, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Cameroon?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Cameroon rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Burkina Faso ranks 57th and Cameroon ranks 56th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).