Burundi vs Madagascar: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Burundi
- Madagascar
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 3,060 t against 2,939 t in Madagascar, a difference of 121 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Madagascar ahead.
Burundi ranks 110th and Madagascar ranks 112th of 185 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 12.45 t | 1,301 t | 1,288 t | Madagascar |
| 1970s | 121.18 t | 2,793 t | 2,672 t | Madagascar |
| 1980s | 336.32 t | 2,503 t | 2,167 t | Madagascar |
| 1990s | 349.8 t | 2,274 t | 1,924 t | Madagascar |
| 2000s | 323.2 t | 1,995 t | 1,672 t | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 1,985 t | 2,862 t | 877.43 t | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 3,060 t | 3,634 t | 573.43 t | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Burundi or Madagascar?
- Burundi, at 3,060 t against 2,939 t in Madagascar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Burundi and Madagascar?
- 121 t, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Madagascar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Madagascar rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Burundi ranks 110th and Madagascar ranks 112th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).