Cabo Verde vs Egypt: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Cabo Verde
- Egypt
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 115,038 t against 21.58 t in Cabo Verde, a difference of 115,016 t.
That makes Egypt's figure about 5,330.8 times Cabo Verde's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 29th and Egypt ranks 28th of 29 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 24.07 t | 913.37 t | 889.3 t | Egypt |
| 1970s | 21.54 t | 2,704 t | 2,683 t | Egypt |
| 1980s | 31.66 t | 16,941 t | 16,909 t | Egypt |
| 1990s | 15.11 t | 25,135 t | 25,120 t | Egypt |
| 2000s | 16.23 t | 40,114 t | 40,097 t | Egypt |
| 2010s | 7.8 t | 58,901 t | 58,893 t | Egypt |
| 2020s | 26.77 t | 109,830 t | 109,803 t | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Cabo Verde or Egypt?
- Egypt, at 115,038 t against 21.58 t in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Cabo Verde and Egypt?
- 115,016 t, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Egypt?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Egypt rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Cabo Verde ranks 29th and Egypt ranks 28th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).