Cambodia vs Malawi: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Cambodia
- Malawi
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 23,371 t against 20,424 t in Malawi, a difference of 2,947 t.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malawi ahead.
Cambodia ranks 66th and Malawi ranks 69th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 268.27 t | 786.84 t | 518.57 t | Malawi |
| 1970s | 429.18 t | 2,435 t | 2,006 t | Malawi |
| 1980s | 440.82 t | 4,636 t | 4,195 t | Malawi |
| 1990s | 428.94 t | 4,316 t | 3,887 t | Malawi |
| 2000s | 778.96 t | 8,445 t | 7,666 t | Malawi |
| 2010s | 6,157 t | 12,357 t | 6,200 t | Malawi |
| 2020s | 23,104 t | 20,751 t | 2,353 t | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Cambodia or Malawi?
- Cambodia, at 23,371 t against 20,424 t in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Cambodia and Malawi?
- 2,947 t, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Malawi?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Malawi rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Cambodia ranks 66th and Malawi ranks 69th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).