Central Asia vs Egypt: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Central Asia
- Egypt
How they compare
Central Asia currently reports 120,509 t against 115,038 t in Egypt, a difference of 5,471 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Central Asia ahead.
Central Asia ranks 26th and Egypt ranks 28th of 29 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Central Asia averaged higher in 4 and Egypt in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 37,022 t | 913.37 t | 36,109 t | Central Asia |
| 1970s | 98,144 t | 2,704 t | 95,439 t | Central Asia |
| 1980s | 142,718 t | 16,941 t | 125,778 t | Central Asia |
| 1990s | 75,344 t | 25,135 t | 50,209 t | Central Asia |
| 2000s | 31,817 t | 40,114 t | 8,296 t | Egypt |
| 2010s | 50,311 t | 58,901 t | 8,590 t | Egypt |
| 2020s | 87,948 t | 109,830 t | 21,881 t | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Central Asia or Egypt?
- Central Asia, at 120,509 t against 115,038 t in Egypt as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Central Asia and Egypt?
- 5,471 t, with Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Egypt?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Central Asia and Egypt rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Central Asia ranks 26th and Egypt ranks 28th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).