Chile vs Denmark: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Chile
- Denmark
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 39,840 t against 38,476 t in Chile, a difference of 1,364 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 50th and Denmark ranks 48th of 201 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7,193 t | 148,011 t | 140,818 t | Denmark |
| 1970s | 7,692 t | 150,282 t | 142,590 t | Denmark |
| 1980s | 9,770 t | 122,768 t | 112,998 t | Denmark |
| 1990s | 30,239 t | 90,910 t | 60,671 t | Denmark |
| 2000s | 30,741 t | 61,904 t | 31,163 t | Denmark |
| 2010s | 30,309 t | 49,907 t | 19,598 t | Denmark |
| 2020s | 36,312 t | 52,802 t | 16,490 t | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Chile or Denmark?
- Denmark, at 39,840 t against 38,476 t in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Chile and Denmark?
- 1,364 t, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Denmark?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Denmark rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Chile ranks 50th and Denmark ranks 48th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).