Congo vs Kazakhstan: Mineral fertilizers β Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers β Cropland potassium over time
- Congo
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Congo currently reports 2,668 t against 2,532 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 136 t.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Congo ranks 127th and Kazakhstan ranks 129th of 201 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,027 t | 4,492 t | 3,465 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 590.21 t | 1,521 t | 930.35 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 599.51 t | 2,480 t | 1,880 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 2,058 t | 2,561 t | 503.29 t | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers β cropland potassium, Congo or Kazakhstan?
- Congo, at 2,668 t against 2,532 t in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers β cropland potassium between Congo and Kazakhstan?
- 136 t, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Kazakhstan rank globally for mineral fertilizers β cropland potassium?
- Congo ranks 127th and Kazakhstan ranks 129th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).