Costa Rica vs Honduras: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Costa Rica
- Honduras
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 52,744 t against 45,567 t in Honduras, a difference of 7,177 t.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Honduras's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 40th and Honduras ranks 43rd of 186 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6,295 t | 1,828 t | 4,467 t | Costa Rica |
| 1970s | 15,022 t | 5,802 t | 9,220 t | Costa Rica |
| 1980s | 18,360 t | 6,788 t | 11,572 t | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 36,337 t | 11,340 t | 24,997 t | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 51,765 t | 9,158 t | 42,607 t | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 47,713 t | 34,529 t | 13,185 t | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 54,425 t | 47,184 t | 7,241 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Costa Rica or Honduras?
- Costa Rica, at 52,744 t against 45,567 t in Honduras as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Costa Rica and Honduras?
- 7,177 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Honduras?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Honduras rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Costa Rica ranks 40th and Honduras ranks 43rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).