Côte d'Ivoire vs Japan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 125,982 t against 51,543 t in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 74,439 t.
That makes Japan's figure about 2.4 times Côte d'Ivoire's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 27th and Japan ranks 27th of 29 groups.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,822 t | 451,906 t | 447,084 t | Japan |
| 1970s | 15,310 t | 479,992 t | 464,683 t | Japan |
| 1980s | 15,704 t | 437,615 t | 421,912 t | Japan |
| 1990s | 12,226 t | 344,606 t | 332,380 t | Japan |
| 2000s | 18,965 t | 259,799 t | 240,834 t | Japan |
| 2010s | 38,563 t | 211,072 t | 172,510 t | Japan |
| 2020s | 49,530 t | 151,436 t | 101,906 t | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Côte d'Ivoire or Japan?
- Japan, at 125,982 t against 51,543 t in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Côte d'Ivoire and Japan?
- 74,439 t, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Japan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Japan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 27th and Japan ranks 27th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).