Côte d'Ivoire vs Uzbekistan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 106,488 t against 51,543 t in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 54,945 t.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 2.1 times Côte d'Ivoire's.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 27th and Uzbekistan ranks 30th of 29 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12,242 t | 44,177 t | 31,934 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 18,965 t | 17,346 t | 1,619 t | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 38,563 t | 40,744 t | 2,182 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 49,530 t | 71,833 t | 22,303 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Côte d'Ivoire or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 106,488 t against 51,543 t in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Côte d'Ivoire and Uzbekistan?
- 54,945 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Uzbekistan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 27th and Uzbekistan ranks 30th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).