Croatia vs Czechia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Croatia
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 18,055 t against 17,889 t in Croatia, a difference of 166 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Croatia ranks 77th and Czechia ranks 76th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Czechia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 29,683 t | 34,252 t | 4,570 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 31,464 t | 27,002 t | 4,462 t | Croatia |
| 2010s | 19,561 t | 27,331 t | 7,770 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 20,821 t | 17,215 t | 3,606 t | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Croatia or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 18,055 t against 17,889 t in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Croatia and Czechia?
- 166 t, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Czechia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Czechia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Croatia ranks 77th and Czechia ranks 76th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).