Cuba vs Sudan (former): Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Cuba
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Sudan (former) currently reports 3,750 t against 3,750 t in Cuba, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 106th and Sudan (former) ranks 105th of 185 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 126,202 t | 63 t | 126,138 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 171,881 t | 333.33 t | 171,548 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 49,634 t | 600 t | 49,034 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 30,334 t | 2,650 t | 27,684 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 32,121 t | 4,350 t | 27,771 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Cuba or Sudan (former)?
- Sudan (former), at 3,750 t against 3,750 t in Cuba as of 2011.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Cuba and Sudan (former)?
- 0 t, with Sudan (former) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sudan (former)?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2011.
- How do Cuba and Sudan (former) rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Cuba ranks 106th and Sudan (former) ranks 105th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).