Czechia vs Senegal: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Czechia
- Senegal
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 18,055 t against 15,748 t in Senegal, a difference of 2,307 t.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Senegal's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 76th and Senegal ranks 78th of 186 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 34,252 t | 4,150 t | 30,102 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 27,002 t | 4,830 t | 22,173 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 27,331 t | 9,134 t | 18,197 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 17,215 t | 14,005 t | 3,210 t | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Czechia or Senegal?
- Czechia, at 18,055 t against 15,748 t in Senegal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Czechia and Senegal?
- 2,307 t, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Senegal?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Senegal rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Czechia ranks 76th and Senegal ranks 78th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).